cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/4522403

We are thrilled to announce the upcoming release of Sublinks, a groundbreaking Link Aggregation Social Network, joining the Fediverse. This innovative platform is designed to revolutionize how we share and discover online. Our dedicated team of volunteer contributors has worked tirelessly, utilizing technologies like Java, Go, TypeScript, and HTML to bring this vision to life. Sublinks promises a user-friendly interface and robust features that cater to diverse online communities. Stay tuned for our launch date, and get ready to experience a new era of social link sharing!

Sublinks will have a fully compatible API with Lemmy so all current Lemmy apps will also work with Sublinks. In fact, discuss.online will switch to Sublinks to fully replace Lemmy once we reach our Parity Milestone.

For more information, visit GitHub - Sublinks and sublinks.org.

Stay tuned for more regular updates as we progress.

          • @nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            Not really, Kbin (which also similar to core function as Lemmy) has better interoperability with Mastodon.

            Nutomic, Lemmy dev, reject that idea. Quoted from himself: “Like you said, Kbin already supports this. No need to reimplement it in Lemmy, definitely wouldnt be worth all the effort.”

              • HACKthePRISONS
                link
                fedilink
                -19 months ago

                i’ve never looked into using my akkoma to interact with lemmy, but i quite like using mastodon.

                  • HACKthePRISONS
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -19 months ago

                    i don’t get what you mean: i quite like having every comment robbed of context and fed to me reverse-chronologically, only to reveal context and display chronologically when clicked

                    i understand some people might find it jarring, but what do you mean by “properly”?