• Neuromancer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -4
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The cgi was used to remove the pilot of the f18. It wasn’t all cartoon look physics bending bs.

    • @t0fr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      Sure the physics of the flight were real as they were flying real aircraft.

      However, it is against the air forces rules to fly so closely in formation. CGI was used to bring the jets closer together to look better on camera. The majority of the environments were CGI as they were not permitted to fly so close to the ground or obstacles. The entire opening sequence with the advanced fighter jet was entirely CGI as that plan does not exist. That’s what CGI looks like when you have the means, time, and budget. Plus combining that with practical effects, leads to the best results.

      • Neuromancer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18 months ago

        And that’s my point. It wasn’t cartoonish special effects with bizarre physics.

        It was well down.

        • @t0fr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Alright. Well I agree

          Perhaps you did not get your point across in your downvoted comment

          • Neuromancer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -28 months ago

            When cgi is done right, it enhances the movie. It’s nearly seamless. Too gun 2 combined great cgi with great practical effects. They didn’t just slap shit cgi over everything and expect people to love it. In thirty years top gun 2 will still look amazing.

            I’ve watched it at home and in the theaters. It still looks good at home. Obviously it looks better in the theaters.

            I’m not a fan of cruise but damn his vision was solid.