https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9436237

@MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
(replaced with my own user profile, as I’m not trying to fill other users’ inboxes for no real reason)(also, this somehow worked right when making this post, but not the original comment)
[@MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de](/u/MachineFab812)
https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9293054 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9620373 https://jlai.lu/comment/6487794

While we’re at it, am I missing at instance-agnostic method for linking posts as well?

  • MentalEdgeEnglish
    4•7 months ago

    Lemmy doesn’t have the development resources to Thanos snap itself into a feature-complete state overnight.

    Forking would make that worse.

    I can smell the entitlement of “when devs can’t be bothered to do the obvious” straight through my screen. We simply do not get to sit here and come up with things that are “so obvious they should be done already”. That’s not how reality works. The wheel didn’t exist until it was invented, and then built by someone.

    I’m only explaining that the solution exists and is currently held by back by the fact that development isn’t done by materializing code into existence with an infinity gauntlet!

    The fact that some client devs implement new API features before the vanilla webUI does (which btw is a separate thing from the lemmy server, and itself merely one client for it, albeit the default) isn’t unusual, or indicative of some massive fundamental problem in how the project is run.

    • @MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.deOPEnglish
      -1•7 months ago

      Read up. I stated I would be refraining from speaking to the difficulty of implimentation as I do not have my laptop with me.

      I’ve written apps/extentions for personal use. I would rather contribute to an existing code-base like Lemmy, but I acknowleged the fact I am in little position to do so, for the next two weeks in fact.

      Entitlement, really? How is your passing the buck to extention/app devs different from my requesting a feature be implimented in the single location where it will stay fixed, saving time and effort for the devs, including for app and extention devs, going forward?

      Where is your suggested solution that could be implimented, beyond suggesting that apps and extentions have this solved for their users, and we should leave it at that?

      I’ve bought multiple such apps, and found the webUI preferable, so I’mma throw my future suggestions, requests, and yes, financial contributions, as well as any code I write if that turns out to be necessary on my part, at the single project that is already doing so many other things I’ve come to enjoy.

      “What.”, you say.

      • MentalEdgeEnglish
        3•7 months ago

        …

        Again. What?

        I’m not passing the buck anywhere, I’m saying the lemmy server can do this but the default lemmy webUI doesn’t make use of it. At least not yet.

        The problem isn’t being solved by the clients and apps. It’s solved by lemmy.

        Some clients have just made use of it sooner than others, and the vanilla webUI is one of the ones that hasn’t yet. But the feature itself IS IN LEMMY ITSELF.