• @solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    187 months ago

    It’s less a technical problem than one of attracting bad actors, then law enforcement chasing the bad actors, warrants, subpoenas, seizures, that whole bit. Think of running a Tor exit oode. If that’s what you want to do and you go into it wth your eyes open, then fine, but sleepwalking into it seems like something to avoid.

    • paraphrand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That really does sound like a bag of hurt.

      But it also sounds like a fuller alternative to what the big guys offer. And in the long run it would make it a well rounded space and protocol.

      It’s too bad that it sounds like it both isn’t straightforward to implement properly, and attracts heat.

      I wish them luck. Privacy and security would be great. People do use these spaces as direct messaging platforms. Even if it’s not the best all around idea. As social spaces evolve, the way people message evolves too. Making it secure earlier in that cycle is good.

      • @solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        Lemmy (at least lemmy.world) has relatively little appetite for edgy content even compared to reddit. Look at the communities and instances that have been banned already.

        It may be worthwhile to offer secure deletion of stored DM’s after some interval, even if they are stored in the clear. I posted some code for that a long time ago. Maybe I can dust it off of rewrite it.

      • @unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        I just feel like the obvious choice is to build a system to seamlessly connect from activitypub to an existing secure messaging platform. Reinventing the wheel like this is just a waste of resources imo.