@ylai@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-27 months agoNot Dead Yet: WD Releases New 6TB 2.5-Inch External Hard Drives - First Upgrade in Seven Yearswww.anandtech.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1221arrow-down16cross-posted to: datahoarder@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1215arrow-down1external-linkNot Dead Yet: WD Releases New 6TB 2.5-Inch External Hard Drives - First Upgrade in Seven Yearswww.anandtech.com@ylai@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-27 months agomessage-square39fedilinkcross-posted to: datahoarder@lemmy.ml
minus-square@fatalError@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglish2•7 months agoMy bet is on density. You cram so much in such a tiny space, so any tiny imperfection or fault will corrupt the data or render the drive unusable.
minus-square4gramslinkfedilinkEnglish2•7 months agoAt the time it was fine. I had an array of 4tb drives that I was backing up with a series of 5gb drives. They were just so unreliable; all but one failed while the array they backed up is still spinning strong.
My bet is on density. You cram so much in such a tiny space, so any tiny imperfection or fault will corrupt the data or render the drive unusable.
At the time it was fine. I had an array of 4tb drives that I was backing up with a series of 5gb drives. They were just so unreliable; all but one failed while the array they backed up is still spinning strong.