• RubberDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 months ago

    Except food is a physical good that needs to be transported, while the service is still provided by low wage workers from across the globe.

    If a corporation gets to provide the service from where it’s cheaper, they can’t be mad people buy it from where it’s cheaper.

    • chiisanaA
      link
      English
      24 months ago

      Service provider must acquire hardwares for the data centre at local vendor pricing.

      Service provider must hire someone local to work in your local data centre.

      Service providers need to pay local electricity and bandwidth rates.

      List goes on. Just because you don’t interface with the local aspects of business doesn’t mean they don’t exist and add extra costs.

      If you want to pay lower rate, as I stated earlier, make your narrative work: use local payment methods, billing address and use the service locally to the locality you’re paying in. Then they’ve got nothing to argue against you as you’re using services in that lower cost region.

      • RubberDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Except the hardware is purchased using a global framework contract that uses the volume as a reason for deep discounts.
        It gets put in a rack by a local guy and then remotely provisioned by some person from a low cost country.
        Electricity in datacenters is purchased at wholesale prices and muchuch cheaper than what consumers pay…
        The list goes on and on.

        The higher prices in countries has only very marginally to do with the higher costs.

        Money grabbing corporations will charge what the market will bare.

        • chiisanaA
          link
          English
          34 months ago

          Without violating my NDA with media companies (YouTube being one of them, incidentally), all I can tell you is you’re wrong about these. I’ve been in this exact sector for over a decade and the operating expenses are much higher comparatively speaking, and the objectives are different depending on region.

          If you’re so inclined to pay the discounted rate, make the narrative work so they have no way of flagging you. Otherwise don’t be surprised if you’re asked to pay local rates.

          • RubberDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            So, where does it differ? Cost of hosting the machine and the data?

            • chiisanaA
              link
              English
              24 months ago

              On purchasing servers; I don’t know about Google specifically, but most media partners I’ve worked with doesn’t have global acquisition as an option for hardwares — not because they don’t have the purchase power/volume, but rather the vendors have region specific distributors with their own sales teams and pricing. Even if you have the personal contacts of VPs high up the chain, someone from IBM China cannot even sell to companies in Canada, and vice versa, for example.

              On people side of things… With YouTube specifically, you’re also not only dealing with their own DC but getting their hardware into local ISPs centres. Logistics around that is not something cheap remote labor can arrange, need actual boots on the ground to facilitate.

              Ad sales is also something that’s kind of localized. YouTube has American teams selling American creator inventories for example. Not something that’s outsourced out.

              So yea… Although from the outset it’s all just “YouTube.com”, there’s actually a lot of localized touch points that creates different costs to provide service in different regions.

              • RubberDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 months ago

                When I did it before, our company bought the hardware in bulk. We prep it, provision it and have it good to go. Then ship it off to wherever. PM has the local DC staff (if they provide that service, else a local IT company install the box and bring it online. The moment it is online everything is managed remotely. The local install costs is usually a few 100, once, just like the shipping.

                We even shipped full racks (assembly required) with a complete connection diagram. All it needed was power and 2 internet cables everything else was done already.

                If companies like google expand, this will surely be similar. But then at even larger scale. I cannot imagine them going around trying to find equipment everytime. You just have a contract with dell/HP/IBM/NetApp/Oracle and ask your account manager to ship you x number of type A server.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14 months ago

      Internet isn’t free. It takes copper or fiber cable, switching and routing equipment, labor to operate and install them, and electricity to run it all. Those costs are also lower in other countries.

      So if you subscribe in a low-cost country, does it make sense for them to let you use the high-cost infrastructure?

      • RubberDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        It is just some Telcos that price for data usage and put in usage caps. But this is only a way to price gauge customers. In the EU most ISPs operate without datacaps and are much cheaper month to month than in the US (my 1gb symmetric fiber connection without datacaps costs around 30 euro per month).

        Sure a data connection in a datacenter is more expensive, but is either shared across datacenter customers or a customer gets their own. And again, global players have framework contracts with other global players… so maybe Orange Business Services provides the internet connection for their DC operation globally.

        The cost for the things they have to source locally is highly overestimated. Usually budgets they spend locally on stuff like advertising are much higher.