We are changing our system. We settled on git (but are open for alternatives) as long as we can selfhost it on our own machines.

Specs

Must have

  • hosted on promise
  • reliabile
  • unlikely to be discontinued in the next >5 years
  • for a group of at least 20 people

Plus

  • gui / windows integration
  • EffortlessOps
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’ve been looking at gitea because of its gitops capabilities that seem to be pretty much on par with github actions. Do you know if forgejo has something similar? There seems to be a lack of documentation in that area. This has been my only reason for not moving to forgejo but im hoping im wrong and just missed some documentation.

    EDIT: Thank you all who provided some additional insights that I was missing. I’ll take the leap and give forgejo a try!

    • @seang96@spgrn.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      There are forejo runners and they seem compatible with a bunch of github actions. I created one that builds a docker image and publishes it on the repo.

    • @PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      Forgejo actions is basically GitHub actions. The difference in my ci scripts is a single line and you can even use GitHub action templates or whatever they’re called.

      You just need to add some runners to your server, which is pretty easily doable by just using some docker container and deploying that multiple times