Image shows a grid of four columns and eight rows detailing the difference between four common types of file transfer: tftp, ftp, sftp, and scp; across eight data points: transfer protocol, standard port, speed overview, security overview, authentication support, encryption support, and connection orientation.

  • TFTP : UDP, port 69, Fast, Less Secure, No Authentication, No Encryption, and Connection-less
  • FTP: TCP, port 20, 21, Slow, Less Secure, Authentication, No Encryption, and Connection-oriented
  • SFTP: TCP, Port 22, Slow, Secure, Authentication, Encryption, and Connection-oriented
  • SCP: TCP, Port 22, Fast, Secure, Authentication, Encryption, and Connection-oriented

Src: Twitter via LinkedIn.

  • @KingSlareXIV@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Forgot the one everyone wishes they could forget - FTPS !

    Might be worth noting that SCP is non- interactive file transfer only, whereas FTP/SFTP can do interactive sessions and management functions as well.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the last 10+ years I’ve only used TFTP with Cisco network appliances.

      I’ll never stop being fascinated by the niches that some tech is able to find.

    • @vettnerk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      While that is a very common use case (bootp), I’ve ran across a lot of hardware that use it for config upload and download:

      • To upload a config to an industrial grade Garettcom switch you need to use tftp. Same goes for firmware updates and config backups.

      • This Cisco phone I was battling with once tried to download a config vea TFTP feom its DHCP server, assuming its DHCP server was part of the SIP infrastructure. The above mechanism was also used successfully by some other proprietary hardware built inhouse for firmware updates.

  • @mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Lol i’m pretty sure SFTP, SCP, and rsync are pretty much all the same when it comes to speed. I’ve used all three very frequently, and by both bitrate and total time, only rsync or scp very rarely edges out for single small files.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      thanks. its been awhile since I was using them a lot but even years ago it seemed pretty much all the same.

  • chiisanaA
    link
    61 year ago

    I don’t understand (in this day and age) how any of these protocols have comparable performance difference to need the “Fast”/“Slow” row. None of these protocols would be computationally intensive enough to make a difference in performance, and should be only limited by line speed, no?